Do not use these citations blindly. Its only a starting point. You should look up these cases to see if it relates to your case in a positive light. If the similarity of using these citations helps, then use them to help win your eeoc claim.
A. The first group of citations to help win your EEOC appeal, deals with the complaint process and may overturn a denied claim on the basis of failure to submit on a timely basis. (this is probably the single reason most claims are denied)
The Commission has held that the time requirements for initiating EEO counseling can be waived as to certain allegations within a complaint when the complainant alleged a continuing violation; that is, a series of related discriminatory acts, one of which fell within the time period for contacting an EEO Counselor.
McGivern v. USPS, EEOC Request No. 05901150 (December 28, 1990)
Scott v. Claytor, 469 F. Supp. 22, 26 (D.D.C. 1978)
Reid v. Department of Commerce, EEOC Request No. 05970705 (April 22, 1999)
Moller v. Department of Health and Human Services, EEOC Request No. 05960505 (July 24, 1997) (regarding a claim of discrimination raised under the Equal Pay Act)
Martinez v. Department of Defense, EEOC Appeal No. 01983397 (June 23, 1997)Jane Siegel v. Department of Commerce 01A20556 March 28, 2002
Hugh V. Conrad v. Department of Justice 01A14259 May 7, 2002
Thomas J. Terrell, Jr. v. Department of the Air Force appeal 01983951 (June 14, 2000)
Robinson v. General Services Administration, EEOC Request No. 05950558 (July 1, 1996)
Finding that the agency would be able to continue its discrimination in perpetuity with no remedy available for the complainant if it can dismiss a claim for untimeliness when it has allegedly failed to provide complainant with equal pay for equal work on a continuing basis
B. The second group of citations to help win your EEOC appeal, deals with an improper decision of your case by an AJ who improperly made a credibility determination in favor of agency witnesses, while at the same time overlooked direct evidence.
Anthony W. Jackson v. Department of the Army, Appeal No. 0120111588 Hearing No. 541-2010-00019X Agency No. 09FEB00719
Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 7-1 (November 9, 1999); see also 29 C.F.R. § 1614.109(e).
Mi S. Bang v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01961575 (March 26, 1998)
Chronister v. U.S. Postal Serv., EEOC Request No. 05940578 Apr. 25,
C. The third group of citations to help win your EEOC case, will help to show a pattern of discrimination, instead of what looked like isolated instances. These citations from groups A, B and C can help you in various cases and can be combined to show discrimination is not isolated.
Ferguson v. Department of Justice, EEOC Request No. 05970792 (March 30, 1999)
Meaney v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05940169 (November 12, 1993).
Manalo v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Requests No. 05970255 and 05970255 (June 1, 1998).
Vissing v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, EEOC Request No. 05890308 (June 13, 1989)
Verkennes v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05900700 (September 21, 1990)
Maldonado v. Department of the Interior, EEOC Request No. 05900937 (October 31, 1990)
Rickey D. Brown v. Department of the Army 05970558 September 18, 2000
Woljan v. Environmental Protection Agency, EEOC Request No. 05950361 (October 5, 1995)
Terrell v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Appeal No. 01997277 pursuant to 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (to be codified and hereinafter referred to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.606)
By alleging a pattern of harassment, complainant has stated a cognizable claim under the EEOC
regulations with regard to claims (1) and (2).
Cervantes v. USPS, EEOC Request No. 05930303 (November 12, 1993).
You must research these case before citing, because it appears denied:
Berry v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State Univ., 715 F.2d 971, 981 (5th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 868 (1986).
Williams v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05920506 (August 25, 1992)
