Winning most but not all discrimination complaints result in lowered attorney fees

William B. Smith,

Complainant,

v.

Eric K. Shinseki,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120112724

Agency No. 2001-0534-2007101565

DECISION

Complainant timely initiated an appeal from the Agency’s March

22, 2011 final Agency decision (FAD) concerning his entitlement

to attorneys’ fees as a result of a finding of discrimination in

violation of  Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII),

as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.  The appeal is accepted pursuant

to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(a).

BACKGROUND

In Smith v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. 0120091163

(Jan. 21, 2011), the Commission reversed in part the Agency’s final

order and found that the Agency had violated the Equal Pay Act of

1963 (EPA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) et seq. when Complainant

learned that the position for a female Clinic Administrator at a smaller

Outpatient Clinic (OPC), was graded at the GS-13 level, while his position

at a larger OPC was graded at the GS-12 level.  The Commission noted that

where the jurisdictional prerequisites of both the EPA and Title VII are

satisfied, a violation of the EPA is a violation of Title VII.  See 29

C.F.R. § 1620.27; see also Jones v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, EEOC

Appeal No. 01994717 (Nov. 2, 2000). Complainant alleged nine additional

claims; however, the Commission affirmed the final order finding that

Complainant was not subjected to discrimination or harassment as to

those claims.

The Commission ordered the Agency to (1) promote Complainant to the

GS-13 grade level; (2) determine the appropriate amount of back pay,

with interest, and benefits for the difference between the GS-12 salary

he received and the GS-13 salary he should have received; (3) issue

a FAD on his claim for compensatory damages; (4) provide EEO training

to responsible management officials; (5) provide a compliance report to

the Commission; (6) post a “Notice to Employees” that discrimination

has occurred; and, (7) pay reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.

On March 22, 2011, the Agency issued a FAD regarding Complainant’s

request for attorneys’ fees and costs.  Complainant requested $19,982

in attorneys’ fees and $361.10 in costs or $20,343.10 in total.

The Agency found that Complainant’s claims were not intertwined in

such a manner to warrant the entire award of attorneys’ fees requested.

As Complainant only prevailed on one of the 10 claims alleged, the Agency

found that Complainant was only entitled to 10% of the amount requested.

Thus, the Agency awarded Complainant $1,998.20.  In addition, the Agency

found that no supporting documentation was submitted for the amount of

costs requested; however, the Agency determined the amount was reasonable

and awarded Complainant the requested $361.10.

CONTENTIONS ON APPEAL

On appeal, Complainant contends that the Agency’s award of 10% of

the requested attorneys’ fees was improper because the fee petition

already excluded hours spent on his unsuccessful claims.  Further,

Complainant argues that he is entitled to the full amount requested

because he prevailed on one of the most material claims in his complaint

and recovered a significant portion of the relief sought.  Accordingly,

Complainant requests that the Commission award him $20,343.10 in

attorneys’ fees and costs.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

Title VII and the Commission’s regulations authorize the award

of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to a prevailing Complainant.

29 C.F.R. § 1614.501(e); see also Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 11-1 (Nov. 9, 1999).

Fee awards are typically calculated by multiplying the number of hours

reasonably expended times a reasonable hourly rate, an amount also known

as a lodestar. There is a strong presumption that this amount represents

the reasonable fee. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.501(e)(ii)(B); Blum v. Stenson,

465 U.S. 886, 899 (1984); Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 435 (1983).

After a careful review of the record and consideration of the above

criteria, the Commission finds that the Agency’s 90% reduction in the

requested attorneys’ fee award was improper.  In total, Complainant

requested $19,982 in attorney’s fees for 82.9 hours of work related to

the Equal Pay Act claim upon which he prevailed.  Complainant submitted

invoices evidencing that his attorneys expended a total of 125.5 total

hours for work performed on the entire complaint.  Thus, the amount

requested already included a 33% reduction in hours for work expended on

Complainant’s unsuccessful claims.  This reduction fairly addresses the

Agency’s expressed concerns.  Taking into account that Complainant was

the prevailing party on one of the most material claims in his complaint

and the remedy obtained, the Commission concludes that that any further

fee reduction is not warranted.

CONCLUSION

Based on a thorough review of the record and the contentions on appeal,

including those not specifically addressed herein, the Commission MODIFIES

the Agency’s final decision and REMANDS the matter to the Agency to comply

with the Order below to the extent that it has not already done so.1

ORDER

Within 30 days of the date this decision becomes final, the Agency

shall pay Complainant $20,343.10 in attorneys’ fees and costs.

Evidence showing that such payment has been made shall be sent to the

Compliance Officer referenced below.

ATTORNEY’S FEES (H0610)

If Complainant has been represented by an attorney (as defined by 29

C.F.R. § 1614.501(e)(1)(iii)), he/she is entitled to an award of

reasonable attorney’s fees incurred in the processing of the complaint.

29 C.F.R. § 1614.501(e).  The award of attorney’s fees shall be paid

by the Agency.  The attorney shall submit a verified statement of fees

to the Agency — not to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,

Office of Federal Operations — within thirty (30) calendar days of this

decision becoming final.  The Agency shall then process the claim for

attorney’s fees in accordance with 29 C.F.R. § 1614.501.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION’S DECISION (K0610)

Compliance with the Commission’s corrective action is mandatory.

The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall

be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC

20013.  The Agency’s report must contain supporting documentation, and

the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant.  If the

Agency does not comply with the Commission’s order, the Complainant

may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order.  29 C.F.R. §�

�1614.503(a).  The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action

to enforce compliance with the Commission’s order prior to or following

an administrative petition for enforcement.  See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407,

1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(g).  Alternatively, the Complainant

has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in

accordance with the paragraph below entitled “Right to File A Civil

Action.”  29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407 and 1614.408.  A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).

If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS – ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See

29 C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (Nov. 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013.  In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604.  The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request.  Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration.  The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency

head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full

name and official title.  Failure to do so may result in the dismissal

of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security.  See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c).  The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court.  Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File A Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 17, 2011

Date

1 Fees are available for time spent on a fee petition as well as for

time spent defending a petition on appeal.  EEO MD-110 at 11-1.

—————

————————————————————

—————

————————————————————

2

0120112724

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

5

0120112724