• About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
  • DMCA Notice
  • Affiliate Agreement
  • Anti-Spam
  • Disclaimer
  • Sitemap
Civil Rights Federal
  • Home
    • Home – Layout 1
    • Home – Layout 2
    • Home – Layout 3
    • Home – Layout 4
    • Home – Layout 5
    • Home – Layout 6
  • EMPLOYMENT LAW
    • All
    • Business
    • Politics
    • Science
    • World

    Hillary Clinton in white pantsuit for Trump inauguration

    Amazon has 143 billion reasons to keep adding more perks to Prime

    Shooting More than 40 Years of New York’s Halloween Parade

    These Are the 5 Big Tech Stories to Watch in 2017

    Why Millennials Need to Save Twice as Much as Boomers Did

    compensatory damages

    Doctors take inspiration from online dating to build organ transplant AI

    Trending Tags

    • Trump Inauguration
    • United Stated
    • White House
    • Market Stories
    • Election Results
  • DISCRIMINATION
    • All
    • Apps
    • Gadget
    • Mobile
    • Startup

    The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild gameplay on the Nintendo Switch

    Shadow Tactics: Blades of the Shogun Review

    macOS Sierra review: Mac users get a modest update this year

    Hands on: Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 review

    The Last Guardian Playstation 4 Game review

    These Are the 5 Big Tech Stories to Watch in 2017

    Trending Tags

    • Nintendo Switch
    • CES 2017
    • Playstation 4 Pro
    • Mark Zuckerberg
  • RESOURCES
    • All
    • Gaming
    • Movie
    • Music
    • Sports

    The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild gameplay on the Nintendo Switch

    macOS Sierra review: Mac users get a modest update this year

    Hands on: Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 review

    Heroes of the Storm Global Championship 2017 starts tomorrow, here’s what you need to know

    Harnessing the power of VR with Power Rangers and Snapdragon 835

    So you want to be a startup investor? Here are things you should know

  • SITEMAP
    • All
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Health
    • Travel

    Shooting More than 40 Years of New York’s Halloween Parade

    Heroes of the Storm Global Championship 2017 starts tomorrow, here’s what you need to know

    Why Millennials Need to Save Twice as Much as Boomers Did

    compensatory damages

    Doctors take inspiration from online dating to build organ transplant AI

    How couples can solve lighting disagreements for good

    Ducati launch: Lorenzo and Dovizioso’s Desmosedici

    Trending Tags

    • Golden Globes
    • Game of Thrones
    • MotoGP 2017
    • eSports
    • Fashion Week
  • Review

    The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild gameplay on the Nintendo Switch

    Shadow Tactics: Blades of the Shogun Review

    macOS Sierra review: Mac users get a modest update this year

    Hands on: Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 review

    The Last Guardian Playstation 4 Game review

    Intel Core i7-7700K ‘Kaby Lake’ review

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • Home – Layout 1
    • Home – Layout 2
    • Home – Layout 3
    • Home – Layout 4
    • Home – Layout 5
    • Home – Layout 6
  • EMPLOYMENT LAW
    • All
    • Business
    • Politics
    • Science
    • World

    Hillary Clinton in white pantsuit for Trump inauguration

    Amazon has 143 billion reasons to keep adding more perks to Prime

    Shooting More than 40 Years of New York’s Halloween Parade

    These Are the 5 Big Tech Stories to Watch in 2017

    Why Millennials Need to Save Twice as Much as Boomers Did

    compensatory damages

    Doctors take inspiration from online dating to build organ transplant AI

    Trending Tags

    • Trump Inauguration
    • United Stated
    • White House
    • Market Stories
    • Election Results
  • DISCRIMINATION
    • All
    • Apps
    • Gadget
    • Mobile
    • Startup

    The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild gameplay on the Nintendo Switch

    Shadow Tactics: Blades of the Shogun Review

    macOS Sierra review: Mac users get a modest update this year

    Hands on: Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 review

    The Last Guardian Playstation 4 Game review

    These Are the 5 Big Tech Stories to Watch in 2017

    Trending Tags

    • Nintendo Switch
    • CES 2017
    • Playstation 4 Pro
    • Mark Zuckerberg
  • RESOURCES
    • All
    • Gaming
    • Movie
    • Music
    • Sports

    The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild gameplay on the Nintendo Switch

    macOS Sierra review: Mac users get a modest update this year

    Hands on: Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 review

    Heroes of the Storm Global Championship 2017 starts tomorrow, here’s what you need to know

    Harnessing the power of VR with Power Rangers and Snapdragon 835

    So you want to be a startup investor? Here are things you should know

  • SITEMAP
    • All
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Health
    • Travel

    Shooting More than 40 Years of New York’s Halloween Parade

    Heroes of the Storm Global Championship 2017 starts tomorrow, here’s what you need to know

    Why Millennials Need to Save Twice as Much as Boomers Did

    compensatory damages

    Doctors take inspiration from online dating to build organ transplant AI

    How couples can solve lighting disagreements for good

    Ducati launch: Lorenzo and Dovizioso’s Desmosedici

    Trending Tags

    • Golden Globes
    • Game of Thrones
    • MotoGP 2017
    • eSports
    • Fashion Week
  • Review

    The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild gameplay on the Nintendo Switch

    Shadow Tactics: Blades of the Shogun Review

    macOS Sierra review: Mac users get a modest update this year

    Hands on: Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 review

    The Last Guardian Playstation 4 Game review

    Intel Core i7-7700K ‘Kaby Lake’ review

No Result
View All Result
Civil Rights Federal
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

DOUGLAS FACTORS – not to be missed by you

civilrightsfed by civilrightsfed
February 4, 2020
in Uncategorized
0 0
0
0
SHARES
506
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

DOUGLAS FACTORS – not to be missed by you

douglas factors

Sometimes a federal employee goes before the MSPB prior to filing with the EEOC. The use of the 12 Douglas Factors appears to be submissable in all federal courts as well as MSPB and the EEOC. The 12 Douglas Factors have proven very useful in reducing the harshness of facts brought against the complainant. It also dissects the statements against the complainant into more reasoning and if they are the true facts or opinions without facts.

When the MSPB sustains some but not all of the charges or specifications alleged against an employee, the Board must review the agency-imposed penalty to determine whether it is within tolerable limits of reasonableness.

See Douglas v. Veterans Admin., 5 M.S.P.R. 280, 306 (1981). It appears undisputed that the administrative decision in Douglas provides the non-exhaustive list of twelve factors that may be considered in determining the appropriate penalty for a particular offense. See id. at 332; see also McClaskey, 720 F.2d at 587.

The 12 Douglas Factors include:
(1) the nature and seriousness of the offense 
(2) the employee’s job level and type of employment 
(3) the employee’s past disciplinary record
(4) the employee’s past work record, including length of service and dependability 
(5) the effect of the offense on the employee’s ability to perform at a satisfactory level and the supervisor’s confidence in the employee’s ability to perform his assigned duties
(6) consistency of the penalty with those imposed on other employees for similar offenses 
(7) consistency of the penalty with applicable agency table of penalties
(8) the notoriety of the offense or its impact upon the reputation of the agency
(9) the clarity with which the employee was on notice of any rules that were violated
(10) potential for the employee’s rehabilitation 
(11) mitigating circumstances surrounding the offense such as unusual job tensions or personality problems
(12) the adequacy and effectiveness of alternative sanctions to deter such conduct in the future by the employee or others. See Douglas, 5 M.S.P.R. at 305.

It is well-settled that “[t]he board is not required to consider all twelve factors in every case; it need only consider those relevant to the individual case.” McClaskey, 720 F.2d at 588. The MSPB’s role in reviewing the selection of an appropriate remedy is “essentially to assure that the agency did conscientiously consider the relevant factors and did strike a responsible balance within tolerable limits of reasonableness.” Douglas, 5 M.S.P.R. at 306.

A review of the record indicates that TSA Director Clark considered the following aggravating and mitigating factors in deciding to remove Kamahele:

(1) the nature and seriousness of the offense; (2) the nature of his employment with TSA; (3) his length of service; (4) his ability to be rehabilitated and deal with and manage employees; (5) the ability or his willingness to be placed at a different position; (6) his refusal to take responsibility for his actions; (7) his lack of past disciplinary action; (8) his dependability; and (9) the long hours and hectic work environment surrounding the rollout of new security measures.

The AJ found further that Dennis Clark, the deciding official, did not consider all of the relevant Douglas factors, i.e., whether the appellant acted for financial gain, the appellant’s dependability
during his 4 years of service with TSA, and the fact that the appellant’s supervisors at the HNL still had confidence in his work at the time of the removal (the AJ found no evidence in the record that Clark had any contact with the appellant in his performance of his duties since he was the Western Area Director and did not work in Hawaii)

Dunn, 96 M.S.P.R. 166, ¶ 10; Douglas v. Veterans Administration, 5 M.S.P.R. 280, 306 (1981). Thus, the Board will modify a penalty only when it finds that the agency failed to weigh the relevant factors or that the penalty the agency imposed clearly exceeded the bounds of reasonableness. Dunn, 96 M.S.P.R. 166, ¶ 10. If the agency’s penalty is beyond the bounds of reasonableness, the Board will mitigate only to the extent necessary to bring it within the parameters of reasonableness. Id.; Groeber, 84 M.S.P.R. 646, ¶ 14; Payne, 72 M.S.P.R. at 650-51.

We find that the AJ improperly weighed the Douglas factors and substituted his own judgment for Clark’s. Specifically, the AJ found that, although not all of the Douglas factors were relevant in this case, Clark admitted that he did not consider whether the appellant had acted for financial gain or the appellant’s dependability during his 4 years of service with TSA. ID at 57.

However, based on the misconduct with which the appellant was charged, and the fact that there was no obvious financial gain to be had by the appellant from his actions, we find that “financial gain” is not a relevant factor in this case and the AJ erred by considering it.

This is the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board in this appeal. Title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations, section 1201.113(c) (5 C.F.R. § 1201.113(c)).

WARNING: DOUGLAS FACTORS phased out in favor of SMART AGREEMENTS by TSA

Reference for Kenneth Kamahele:

Plaintiff

Kenneth K. Kamahele
Represented by:

Becky T. Chestnut, McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon LLP

Dayna H. Kamimura-Ching, McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon LLP

William C. McCorriston, McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon LLP

Defendant

Janet Napolitano
Represented by:

Rachel S. Moriyama, Office of the United States Attorney
=======================================
My notes on Kamahele case:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
2008 MSPB 106
Docket No. SF-0752-06-0866-I-1
Kenneth K. Kamahele,
Appellant,
v.
Department of Homeland Security,
Agency.
May 15, 2008

A review of the record indicates that TSA Director Clark considered the following aggravating and mitigating factors in deciding to remove Kamahele:

(1) the nature and seriousness of the offense; (2) the nature of his employment with TSA; (3) his length of service; (4) his ability to be rehabilitated and deal with and manage employees; (5) the ability or his willingness to be placed at a different position; (6) his refusal to take responsibility for his actions; (7) his lack of past disciplinary action; (8) his dependability; and (9) the long hours and hectic work environment surrounding the rollout of new security measures.

In June of 2008, Kamahele sued the TSA in federal court, claiming racial discrimination, violation of equal protection of the laws, retaliation and that his firing was based on falsified evidence and a botched investigation.

Kamahele and the TSA reached a settlement late last year, four years after he was fired.
His attorney said the terms of the settlement were confidential.
The TSA gave Kamahele back pay and restored his retirement benefits.

McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon LLP
Mc Corriston Miller Mukai
1900 Avenue of the Stars, Los Angeles, CA 90067-4301 (310) 284-3455 ?

808-529-7300

dayna called me back and said chris cole no longer works at firm, but is the one who handled the case. I tracked down chris cole.

chris cole
Tel:808.523.2543

808-523-2500

spoke with chris cole, who said he no longer accepts these types of cases. he recommended the hawaii state bar.

808-537-9140 hawaii state bar referral line.

ASB Tower
Suite 2200
1001 Bishop Street
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813

Where, as here, the Board sustains the agency’s charges, but not all of the
specifications of those charges, it will review the agency-imposed penalty to
determine whether it is within the parameters of reasonableness. Groeber v. U.S.
Postal Service, 84 M.S.P.R. 646, ¶ 14 (2000), aff’d, 13 F. App’x 973 (Fed. Cir.
2001); Payne v. U.S. Postal Service, 72 M.S.P.R. 646, 650-51 (1996). The
Board’s function is not to displace management’s responsibility or to decide what
penalty it would impose, but to assure that management’s judgment has been properly exercised and that the penalty selected by the agency does not exceed
the maximum limits of reasonableness. Dunn, 96 M.S.P.R. 166, ¶ 10; Douglas v.
Veterans Administration, 5 M.S.P.R. 280, 306 (1981). Thus, the Board will
modify a penalty only when it finds that the agency failed to weigh the relevant
factors or that the penalty the agency imposed clearly exceeded the bounds of
reasonableness. Dunn, 96 M.S.P.R. 166, ¶ 10. If the agency’s penalty is beyond
the bounds of reasonableness, the Board will mitigate only to the extent necessary
to bring it within the parameters of reasonableness. Id.; Groeber, 84 M.S.P.R.
646, ¶ 14; Payne, 72 M.S.P.R. at 650-51. We find that, in mitigating the penalty,
the AJ did not give appropriate deference to the agency’s penalty determination
and that the circumstances analyzed under the Douglas factors do not warrant
mitigation in this case.

¶13 We find that the AJ improperly weighed the Douglas factors and
substituted his own judgment for Clark’s. Specifically, the AJ found that,
although not all of the Douglas factors were relevant in this case, Clark admitted

that he did not consider whether the appellant had acted for financial gain or the
appellant’s dependability during his 4 years of service with TSA. ID at 57.

¶14 However, based on the misconduct with which the appellant was charged,
and the fact that there was no obvious financial gain to be had by the appellant
from his actions, we find that “financial gain” is not a relevant factor in this case
and the AJ erred by considering it. Further, Clark stated that he considered the
appellant’s length of service and his lack of any prior discipline. Feb. 15 Tr. at
179-81. Thus, in essence, Clark did consider the appellant’s dependability during
his service with the agency. We therefore find that the AJ inappropriately found
that Clark failed to afford proper consideration to several relevant Douglas
factors and, thus, improperly concluded that he was not required to defer to the
agency’s penalty determination.

Title 5 of the United States Code, section 7703 (5 U.S.C. § 7703). You may read
this law, as well as review the Board’s regulations and other related material, at
our website, http://www.mspb.gov. Additional information is available at the
court’s website, http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov. Of particular relevance is the court’s
“Guide for Pro Se Petitioners and Appellants,” which is contained within the
court’s Rules of Practice, and Forms 5, 6, and 11.

===================================
My personal notes on my case and Douglas Factors:

1. did I act for financial gain?
1. no obvious financial gain (improperly weighed douglas factors)
1. financial gain is a relvant factor when deterermining if the amount was a theft, when further investigation would reveal causation
3. whistleblowing and given disciplinary actions against, which negated awards, advancement
5. being bullied and hostile work environment, destroyed ability to perform at satisfactory
5. denied transfer
5. nominated for tsa of the year.
6. the phone setup, requested list of every employee terminated by the stso action/write-up
8. while the passengers name was given in the tsa investigation, i am unsure of any public impact
10. potental for rehab. 5 years w/o diginity. have to appeal, given no possible end in site.
*11. mitigating circumstances surrounding the offense such as unusual job tensions or personality problems; and
*12. denied alternative work enviornment, without proper response.
*12  person recommending termination, had bad blood with appelant 1. whistleblower attack 2. whistleblower bomb
*12  besides improper denial of transfer, I was also denied emergency medical leave
*11  overlooked medical documentation, tsa work comp errors by tsa management

 

civilrightsfed

civilrightsfed

Stay Connected test

  • 2.1k Fans
  • 139 Followers
  • 27.7k Followers
  • 205k Subscribers
  • 23.9k Followers
  • 99 Subscribers
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest

can you work for TSA with type II diabetes?

February 2, 2020

Federal Employee Attorney Information

February 4, 2020
Non-Pecuniary Damages

What are non-pecuniary damages?

February 1, 2020

DOUGLAS FACTORS – not to be missed by you

February 4, 2020

A Year of Lives Lost to Diseases Science Has Yet to Tame

0

5 Fashion stories from around the web you might have missed this week

0

Smooth-Talking Hacker Remote-Wipes Reporter’s iPad, MacBook

0

You Have To Watch Mariah Carey’s New Year’s Eve Nightmare in Times Square

0
holocaust-museums

Holocaust Museums in the United States

September 11, 2020

United States District Court is the next step

February 4, 2020

Voluntary settlement attempts

February 4, 2020

DOUGLAS FACTORS – not to be missed by you

February 4, 2020

Recent News

holocaust-museums

Holocaust Museums in the United States

September 11, 2020

United States District Court is the next step

February 4, 2020

Voluntary settlement attempts

February 4, 2020

DOUGLAS FACTORS – not to be missed by you

February 4, 2020
Civil Rights Federal

We bring you the best Premium WordPress Themes that perfect for news, magazine, personal blog, etc. Check our landing page for details.

Follow Us

Categories

  • ADA
  • Administrative Judge
  • Administrative Remedies
  • African American Female
  • Aggrieved Employee
  • AJ
  • Anti Semitism
  • Apps
  • Attorney
  • Attorney Fees
  • Award Reduction
  • Back Pay
  • Back Pay Act
  • Best Qualified
  • Bullying
  • Business
  • Calculations
  • Carpenter
  • Case
  • Catholic Religion
  • Chain Of Command
  • Chiropractic
  • Christian Religion
  • Civil Action
  • Civil Rights Act
  • Civil rights Activist
  • Civil Rights Attorney
  • Class Action Attorney
  • Compensatory Damages
  • Complainant
  • Constructive Discharge
  • Court Records
  • Credibility
  • Damages
  • Database
  • Denied Awards
  • Denied Training
  • Department Of Justice
  • Department Of Veterans Affairs
  • Deposition
  • Deposition
  • Depression
  • Destruction Of Evidence
  • Disabilities
  • Disability Discrimination
  • Disability Retirement
  • Discrimination Claims
  • Dismissal Decisons
  • Disparate Treatment
  • District Court
  • Doctor
  • Documentation
  • DOJ
  • Douglas Factors
  • Earnings
  • EEOC
  • EEOC Administration
  • EEOC Appeal
  • EEOC Claim
  • EEOC Complaint
  • EEOC Counselor
  • EEOC Discrimination
  • EEOC Lawyer
  • EEOC Settlement Agreement
  • EEOC Training
  • Emotional Distresss
  • Emotional Injuries
  • Employment Attorney
  • Employment law
  • Equitable Relief
  • Evidence Of Record
  • Examine
  • Expense Report
  • expenses
  • Expert Witness
  • FAA
  • FAD
  • Failure To Disclose
  • Family
  • FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE ACT
  • Family Medical Leave Act
  • Fashion
  • Federal Agencies
  • Federal Agency
  • Federal Court
  • Federal Employee
  • Federal Employee Attorney
  • Federal Employee Attorney
  • Federal Employee Discrimination
  • Federal Employment
  • Federal Investigator
  • Federal Judiciary
  • Federal Laws
  • Federal Retirement
  • Female
  • Filing Complaint
  • Final Agency Decision
  • FMLA Attorney
  • FMLA Discrimination
  • FOIA
  • Food
  • Funeral Cost
  • Future Damages
  • Gadget
  • Gaming
  • Gender Discrimination
  • Good Faith
  • Health
  • Hospital Bill
  • Hostile Work Environment
  • Inappropriate Behavior
  • Incidences
  • Individual Right Of Action
  • Invoices
  • Jewish Religion
  • Jurisdiction
  • Law
  • Lawsuit
  • Legal Actions
  • Legal Assistance
  • Legal References
  • Legal Representation
  • Lifestyle
  • Make Whole
  • Manager
  • Medical Claims Review
  • Medical Documentation
  • Medical Evidence
  • Medical Expenses
  • Medical Opinion
  • Medical Reimbursement
  • memory loss
  • Mental Disability
  • Mental Impairment
  • Misconduct
  • Mistakes
  • Mobile
  • Monstrously Excessive
  • Movie
  • MSPB
  • MSPB
  • MSPB Attorney
  • Music
  • National Origin Discrimination
  • NELA
  • News
  • No Fear Act
  • Non Pecuniary
  • Non Selection
  • Non Selection
  • Out Of Pocket Expense
  • Past Pecuniary
  • Pay Discrimination
  • Pecuniary Damages
  • Pecuniary Losses
  • Personnel Files
  • Physician
  • Politics
  • Postal Worker
  • Pre Existing Medical Condition
  • Privacy Laws
  • Promotion Discrimination
  • Protected EEO Activity
  • Punitive Damages
  • Racial Discrimination
  • Rape
  • Reasonable Accommodation
  • Reasonable Accommodation
  • Record Keeping
  • Referee Doctor
  • Reimbursement
  • Religious Discrimination
  • Remedy A Harm
  • Reprisal Discrimination
  • Request Accommodation
  • Request Accommodation
  • Restore Annual Leave
  • Restore Sick Leave
  • Retaliation Claims
  • Retroactive Promotion
  • Review
  • Right To Civil Action
  • Right To Sue
  • Saving Medical Bills
  • Saving Reciepts
  • Science
  • Seperation
  • Settlement Agreement
  • Settlement Offer
  • Settlements
  • Sexual Discrimination
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Similar Cases
  • Single Incident
  • Smart Agreeement
  • Sports
  • Spouse
  • Spouse
  • Stall Tactics
  • Startup
  • Substantial Evidence
  • Supervisor
  • Symptoms
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • TSP
  • Uncategorized
  • USPS
  • Valuing Your Case
  • voided settlements
  • Winning EEOC claims
  • Witness
  • Witness
  • World
  • Wrongful Termination

Browse by Category

  • ADA
  • Administrative Judge
  • Administrative Remedies
  • African American Female
  • Aggrieved Employee
  • AJ
  • Anti Semitism
  • Apps
  • Attorney
  • Attorney Fees
  • Award Reduction
  • Back Pay
  • Back Pay Act
  • Best Qualified
  • Bullying
  • Business
  • Calculations
  • Carpenter
  • Case
  • Catholic Religion
  • Chain Of Command
  • Chiropractic
  • Christian Religion
  • Civil Action
  • Civil Rights Act
  • Civil rights Activist
  • Civil Rights Attorney
  • Class Action Attorney
  • Compensatory Damages
  • Complainant
  • Constructive Discharge
  • Court Records
  • Credibility
  • Damages
  • Database
  • Denied Awards
  • Denied Training
  • Department Of Justice
  • Department Of Veterans Affairs
  • Deposition
  • Deposition
  • Depression
  • Destruction Of Evidence
  • Disabilities
  • Disability Discrimination
  • Disability Retirement
  • Discrimination Claims
  • Dismissal Decisons
  • Disparate Treatment
  • District Court
  • Doctor
  • Documentation
  • DOJ
  • Douglas Factors
  • Earnings
  • EEOC
  • EEOC Administration
  • EEOC Appeal
  • EEOC Claim
  • EEOC Complaint
  • EEOC Counselor
  • EEOC Discrimination
  • EEOC Lawyer
  • EEOC Settlement Agreement
  • EEOC Training
  • Emotional Distresss
  • Emotional Injuries
  • Employment Attorney
  • Employment law
  • Equitable Relief
  • Evidence Of Record
  • Examine
  • Expense Report
  • expenses
  • Expert Witness
  • FAA
  • FAD
  • Failure To Disclose
  • Family
  • FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE ACT
  • Family Medical Leave Act
  • Fashion
  • Federal Agencies
  • Federal Agency
  • Federal Court
  • Federal Employee
  • Federal Employee Attorney
  • Federal Employee Attorney
  • Federal Employee Discrimination
  • Federal Employment
  • Federal Investigator
  • Federal Judiciary
  • Federal Laws
  • Federal Retirement
  • Female
  • Filing Complaint
  • Final Agency Decision
  • FMLA Attorney
  • FMLA Discrimination
  • FOIA
  • Food
  • Funeral Cost
  • Future Damages
  • Gadget
  • Gaming
  • Gender Discrimination
  • Good Faith
  • Health
  • Hospital Bill
  • Hostile Work Environment
  • Inappropriate Behavior
  • Incidences
  • Individual Right Of Action
  • Invoices
  • Jewish Religion
  • Jurisdiction
  • Law
  • Lawsuit
  • Legal Actions
  • Legal Assistance
  • Legal References
  • Legal Representation
  • Lifestyle
  • Make Whole
  • Manager
  • Medical Claims Review
  • Medical Documentation
  • Medical Evidence
  • Medical Expenses
  • Medical Opinion
  • Medical Reimbursement
  • memory loss
  • Mental Disability
  • Mental Impairment
  • Misconduct
  • Mistakes
  • Mobile
  • Monstrously Excessive
  • Movie
  • MSPB
  • MSPB
  • MSPB Attorney
  • Music
  • National Origin Discrimination
  • NELA
  • News
  • No Fear Act
  • Non Pecuniary
  • Non Selection
  • Non Selection
  • Out Of Pocket Expense
  • Past Pecuniary
  • Pay Discrimination
  • Pecuniary Damages
  • Pecuniary Losses
  • Personnel Files
  • Physician
  • Politics
  • Postal Worker
  • Pre Existing Medical Condition
  • Privacy Laws
  • Promotion Discrimination
  • Protected EEO Activity
  • Punitive Damages
  • Racial Discrimination
  • Rape
  • Reasonable Accommodation
  • Reasonable Accommodation
  • Record Keeping
  • Referee Doctor
  • Reimbursement
  • Religious Discrimination
  • Remedy A Harm
  • Reprisal Discrimination
  • Request Accommodation
  • Request Accommodation
  • Restore Annual Leave
  • Restore Sick Leave
  • Retaliation Claims
  • Retroactive Promotion
  • Review
  • Right To Civil Action
  • Right To Sue
  • Saving Medical Bills
  • Saving Reciepts
  • Science
  • Seperation
  • Settlement Agreement
  • Settlement Offer
  • Settlements
  • Sexual Discrimination
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Similar Cases
  • Single Incident
  • Smart Agreeement
  • Sports
  • Spouse
  • Spouse
  • Stall Tactics
  • Startup
  • Substantial Evidence
  • Supervisor
  • Symptoms
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • TSP
  • Uncategorized
  • USPS
  • Valuing Your Case
  • voided settlements
  • Winning EEOC claims
  • Witness
  • Witness
  • World
  • Wrongful Termination

Recent News

holocaust-museums

Holocaust Museums in the United States

September 11, 2020

United States District Court is the next step

February 4, 2020
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
  • DMCA Notice
  • Affiliate Agreement
  • Anti-Spam
  • Disclaimer
  • Sitemap

© 2018 Civil Rights Federal - Civil Rights Federal CivilRights.

No Result
View All Result

© 2018 Civil Rights Federal - Civil Rights Federal CivilRights.

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok